DRAFT OF A CHAPTER

 

SOCIETY OF ST. PIUS X

Charles P. Poole, Jr.

April 6, 2004; revised June 1, 2006.

 

 

CONTENTS

 

1.     Introduction

2.     Society in Schism

3.     Eucharistic Prayers

4.     The Tridentine Mass

5.     Priest Where is Thy Mass?

6.     How to Bring About Reform in the Church

7.     Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter 

8.     Society of St. Pius X Predicts Papacy of Benedict XVI

 

1.  INTRODUCTION

 

          The Priestly Society of St. Pius X was founded in 1969 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (1905-1991).  Lefebvre was an outspoken supporter of traditional Catholicism, and of eliminating all restrictions on the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Latin Mass.  This is sometimes referred to as the Tridentine Mass because its present day form dates back to the Council of Trent (1545-1563), and it has also been called the Indult Mass since a priest originally needed an indult or special permission from the Holy See to celebrate it.  More recently the local Ordinary or bishop has been empowered to grant this permission.

 

2.  A SOCIETY IN SCHISM

 

          There was a great deal of tension when Lefebvre condemned many of the reforms implemented by the Second Vatican Council as heretical, and he instructed the priests of his Society of Pius X to use of the pre-Vatican II liturgies and the Latin language in saying Mass, administering the sacraments,  reading the Divine Office, etc.  The Holy See insisted that he and his priestly Society conform to Novus Ordo or post-Vatican II liturgical practices, and he refused to do so.  After prolonged discussions and exhortations, he ordained four bishops, and was subsequently excommunicated in 1988.  The Society, now in schism, has sustained its growth and its promulgation of the practices of what they call traditional Catholicism.  They believe that they are the true line of the Church, and that the rest of us are the ones in schism. 

 

          The focal point of their loyalty to Lefebvre, and the rallying cry that sparks their growth in numbers, is the “proscribed” Tridentine Mass. This Mass was forbidden in the aftermath of Vatican II because taking this step seemed necessary to ensure that the new liturgy in the vernacular would gain acceptance among the people.  By the 1980's the Novus Ordo liturgy was firmly entrenched in Catholic society, and the time had come to lift the ban on the Tridentine Mass.   Unfortunately this was not done, and the Society of Pius X continued to flourish.  The Latin Mass, which had been the focal point of Catholic piety for several centuries, had become the proscribed Mass, the forbidden Mass, or in more polite language, the Indult Mass. 

 

Go to Top

3.  EUCHARISTIC PRAYERS

 

          The Novus Ordo Sacramentary issued after the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) contains four main Eucharistic Prayers.  We will make some observations on the historical development of the Mass, and then mention how these four Eucharistic prayers reflect this history.   The Syrian catechetical manual called the Didache, which dates from the end of the first century, contains some prayers which were probably recited at Eucharistic celebrations.  However it is Justin Martyr (100-165) who provides us with our earliest description of the Mass.  It is a rather simple service in which members of the assembly say prayers together, and then offer each other the kiss of peace.  Sometimes there were readings from the prophets and the Acts of the Apostles, and a homily was delivered by the presider.  Following this, for the Eucharistic celebration bread and wine were brought in and presented to the presider who recited a long prayer of thanksgiving, after which all present consumed the consecrated bread and wine.   The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus of Rome, written about the year 225 AD, contains the oldest liturgical form of the Mass.  Eucharistic Prayer II of our present Mass was composed from manuscripts of the Apostolic Tradition which have come down to us as translations in several languages.  Thus Prayer II is the oldest of the four main Eucharistic Prayers. 

         

          Eucharistic Prayer I, called the Roman Canon, was used in the Latin Mass prior to Vatican II, and the text of it is given on our website www.consideringpiusx.com and described in the next section. Early versions of this Canon developed during the fourth to the sixth centuries, but it did not reach a definitive state until after the papacy of St. Gregory the Great, who presided over the Church from 590 to 604.  The format became further standardized when Missals with the entire text of the Mass began appearing in the eleventh century, and they were in general use by about the year 1200.   After the Council of Trent (1545-1563) Pope Pius V issued the Missale Romanum in 1570, and made it binding throughout the Western Rite of the Church.  This Tridentine Mass format remained virtually unchanged thereafter until the reforms that followed Vatican II.  The text was fixed, and the only alteration permitted was the addition of saints’ names to the Communicantes and the Nobis quoque. 

 

          Eucharistic Prayer III is a revised version of what had been originally proposed as an alternative to the Roman Canon, and Eucharistic Prayer IV is based on a format of the type found in eastern liturgies such as that of St. Basil (330-379).   Since the editors of the post-Vatican II Sacramentary made such an effort to compose and restore the Eucharistic Prayers to formats that are ancient in the Church, it surprises me that the Society of Pius X, which puts such an emphasis on tradition, has nothing but adverse criticism for all aspects of the Novus Ordo liturgy. They object to both the original Latin version, as well as to the vernacular translations.  They should have especial praise for Eucharistic Prayer II which dates back to the year 225 AD. 

 

Go to Top

4. THE TRIDENTINE MASS

         

          The Mass has traditionally been divided into two parts.  The first part, which was formerly called the Mass of the Catechumens, and is now called the Liturgy of the Word, underwent some dramatic changes in the aftermath of Vatican II.  The opening verse “I will go to the altar of God, to God who giveth joy to my youth”, followed by the recitation of Psalm 42, has been discontinued, and the penitential rite shortened.  There are now two Sunday readings plus the Gospel.  A shortened form of the Confiteor,   the same Gloria, and the same Creed, are said as before.  After the Creed some prayers are omitted, and the Lavabo (hand washing) prayer is shorter.  A Preface and the Sanctus are said as in the past.   Thus significant changes, many of them abridgements, have been made in the Mass up to the beginning of what was formerly called the Canon, and is now the choice of a Eucharistic Prayer.  Eucharistic Prayer I, or the Roman Canon, is very close in wording to the Tridentine Canon, so if is chosen then there are very few changes in the remainder of the Mass, except that the Last Gospel is no longer said. 

 

          To demonstrate this, on the website www.consideringpiusx.com we provide a detailed comparison of the wording of the Canon in the Missale Romanum (1941 edition) and the Latin language Roman Canon or Eucharistic Prayer I taken from Appendix IV of the post Vatican II  Sacramentary (1985 edition).  This word for word comparison indicates that the texts of the two are almost identical, although their rubrics are sometimes worded differently.  Toward the end there are some minor changes between the two versions, but these are not substantial in nature. Thus, if a priest celebrates a Novus Ordo Mass in Latin, which requires no permission or indult, the essential part of the Mass which he says is almost identical with its Tridentine counterpart.  Most of the Mass of the Faithful, now called the Liturgy of the Eucharist, is nearly the same.  It is the beginning, the Mass of the Catechumens, or the Liturgy of the Word, which differs. 

 

          The schismatic Society of St. Pius X website provides answers to 15 frequently asked questions about the Society.  Question 5 is “Why should Catholics have nothing to do with the Novus Ordo Missae?”  It replies that the new rite is “a liturgy for a modernist religion which would marry the Church and the world, Catholicism and Protestantism, light and darkness.”  The claim is made that this new Mass mixes four Catholic elements (a priest, bread and wine, genuflections, and signs of the cross, etc) with three Protestant or heterodox elements (a table, common-place utensils, communion under both kinds and in the hand, etc.).    In actuality the so-called table is just as valid an altar as the turned around ones of the pre-Vatican II liturgies, the utensils are not common-place, and the practices of communion under both kinds and in the hand are not innovations, but rather a return to ancient Church practices.  More serious is their claim that “these Masses can be of doubtful validity,”   and “any Catholic who is aware of its harm, does not have the right to participate.”   The close identity between the Tridentine Canon and Eucharistic Prayer I, explained above and demonstrated on the website, renders these two assertions fatuous. 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Go to Top

5.  PRIEST WHERE IS HY MASS?

         

          During February 2004 the Society of St. Pius X published a 195 page book entitled “Priest Where is Thy Mass?; Mass, Where is Thy Priest?”, and in an announcement it claims to have sent a copy of this book  to every Catholic priest in the United States.   The chapters are interviews with sixteen priests who clearly have some kind of an association with the Lefebvre Schism, although the back cover of the book makes the claim that “none of these priests are members” . . .  “of the Society of Saint Pius X.”   The interviews are diatribes against the Church which are reminiscent of the polemics of many pamphlets and other writings that circulated during the Protestant Reformation era.  If these priests would begin saying the Novus Ordo Mass in Latin using Prex Eucharistica I, which can be done without obtaining an indult or permission from the local Ordinary, they would be celebrating a Liturgy of the Eucharist, that is a Mass of the Faithful, which is almost identical with its Tridentine counterpart.  They should be grateful to the Church for providing them with this option. 

 

Go to Top

6.  HOW TO BRING ABOUT REFORM IN THE CHURCH

 

          There have been many times in its long history when the Church has been in need of reform, and quite often saintly individuals stepped forward to dedicate themselves to bringing about the needed changes.  Transforming an entrenched status quo is not an easy task, and many of the reformers throughout history spent part of their lives in exile, such as Hippolytus, d. 236, Pope Cornelius, d. 253,  Athanasius, d. 373, John Chrysostom, d. 407, Pope Martin I,  d. 655, Anselm, d. 1109,  Anthony Mary Claret, d. 1870, and John Eudes, d. 1680.  Down through the ages successful reformers fought their battles, and won their victories, within the confines of the Church, as loyal but dissatisfied members.  Examples are Gregory VII (Hildebrand), d.1085, Francis of Assisi, d. 1226, Catherine of Siena, d. 1380, Teresa of Avila, d. 1582, and Ignatius Loyola, d. 1556.  Establishing a schismatic Church, and then claiming that is is the true Church, while alleging that the Catholic Church is the one which is in schism, is not a way to bring about a reform.

 

          More information on this topic can be found at our website mentioned above.  On this site we describe the successful efforts of St. Augustine in the fifth century, St. Francis of Assisi in the thirteenth century, and St. Ignatius of Loyola in the sixteenth century to bring about reform in the Church.  We contrast the efforts of these three individuals with those of their respective contemporaries Donatus, Waldo, and Martin Luther who took the road of seceding from the Church.  We suggest that if the members of the Society of St. Pius X wish to successfully promote more reverence for Traditional Catholicism within the Church, then they must return to it.  They weaken their cause by remaining outside. 

 

Go to Top

7.  PRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF ST. PETER

 

The Fraternitas Sacerdotalis Sancti Petri, or Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter, founded in 1988 at the initiative of Pope John Paul II, is a clerical Society of Apostolic Life that has, as its spiritual and liturgical center, the ongoing use of the traditional sacramental rites of the Latin Church.  Its aim is to carry out the Church’s mission, through the operation of parishes, schools, and other apostolic works across the world, by means of its specific sacramental apostolate, under the authority of local bishops.  The Fraternity was established at the initiative of the Holy Father as part of an ongoing effort to make the traditional rites of the Holy Mass and the Sacraments available to the faithful who desire them. It is playing the role within the Church that the Society of St. Pius X is trying to play while remaining outside the Church.  For further information on the Fraternity visit their website at www.fssp.com .

 

8.  SOCIETY OF ST. PIUS X PREDICTS PAPACY OF BENEDICT XVI

 

            In 1989 The Society of St. Pius X published the book “Archbishop Lefebvre and the Vatican” to present its side of the story of how the split with Rome came about.  The cover of this book, displayed below, has portraits of Pope Paul VI who presided over the foundation of SSPX, of Pope John Paul II who presided over the departure of SSXP from the jurisdiction of Rome, and of Pope Benedict XVI who, we hope and pray, will preside over the return of SSPX to the bosom of Holy Mother Church. It is incredible, and decidedly ironic, that Angelus Press was able to predict in 1989 the cardinal who, 16 years later, would occupy the chair of Peter with the letter XVI appended to his new name.  We offer both our thanks and our congratulations to Angelus Press for the Prediction of the Century.                           x

 

                                                                                              

 

 

 

Go to Top