DRAFT OF A CHAPTER

 

ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE

Charles P. Poole, Jr.

April 23, 2004, rev. June 13, 2006

 

CONTENTS

 

          1. Introduction

          2. Anthropic Cosmological Principle

          3. Specific Cosmological Principles   

          4. Implications of the Weak Anthropic Principle 

          5. The Fine Tuning of the Proton-proton Cycle 

          6. Stability Range of Nuclei 

          7. Critical Density and Flatness of the Universe

 

1. INTRODUCTION

 

          In 1986 the astronomer John T. Barrow and the mathematical physicist Frank J. Tipler wrote The Anthropic Cosmological Principle which provides an important missing link in the framing of a comprehensive world view or Weltanschauung.  Such a world view should take into account both current scientific explanations of the origin and development of the universe, as described in the chapters Big Bang Theory and Background for the Big Bang Theory (BBB), as well as traditional Christian beliefs about the creation of the world and the providence of God acting in the world. The present chapter will explain the Anthropic Principle, and the Weltanschauung chapter will make use of it in formulating a Christian Worldview.

 

2. ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE

 

           Until the invention of the telescope, there was a belief common to mankind that human beings have a privileged position in the Universe.  Our universe is the earth surrounded by the sky containing the sun, the  moon, many stars, and a few planets.  When Galileo looked through his telescope. he found that the planet Jupiter had moons which also cycled through phases such as new moon, first quarter, full moon, and last quarter.  Our planet Earth no longer seemed  so privileged.  Astronomers, other scientists, and soon academia adopted the world view or Copernican Principle that Man does not occupy a privileged position in the Universe.  This idea remained dominant until the last few decades of the twentieth century.  At that time some cosmologists began to wonder to what extent we as intelligent observers unfairly influence the type of description that we offer, and the conclusions that we arrive at, concerning the nature of the universe.  In 1974 Brandon Carter suggested that the Copernican Principle is not absolute, but should be limited by an Anthropic Principle which states that: “our location in the Universe is necessarily privileged to the extent of being compatible with our existence as observers.”  In other words, since observers are offering a description of the Universe, it follows that the Universe which they describe must have had the capability of evolving intelligent life so that these observations could be made.   More specifically, conditions close enough to the region of observation must have been suitable for the development of biological evolution leading to the appearance of Man. 

 

Go to Top

3. SPECIFIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLES

 

          Barrow and Tipler put an emphasis on what they refer to as the weak, strong, and final anthropic principles.  These principles are defined by them as follows: 

 

Weak Anthropic Principle:  The observed values of all physical and cosmological quantities are not equally probable,  but they take on values restricted by the requirement that there exist sites where carbon-based life can evolve, and by the requirement the Universe be old enough for it to have already done so. 

 

Strong Anthropic Principle:  The Universe must have in it those properties which allow life to develop in it at some stage of its history. 

 

Final Anthropic Principle (FAP):  Intelligent information processing must come into existence in the Universe, and once it comes into existence, it will never die out.  

 

Mitigated Final Anthropic Principle (FAP):  Intelligent information processing must come into existence in the Universe. 

 

Participatory Anthropic Principle:  Observers are necessary to bring the Universe into being. 

 

Theistic Anthropic Principle:  The physical universe was created in such a manner that it is compatible with the presence of life, more specifically human life, for a duration exceeding several centuries. 

 

          Barrow and Tipler argue that the weak principle is merely a restatement of the general adage that the interpretations made by an observer must take into account the limitations of his measuring apparatus.  The remaining ones are speculative in nature.  The Theistic Principle  provides a rationalization for the pseudoscience Creationism which is discussed in the Intelligent Design chapter.     

 

Go to Top

4. IMPLICATIONS OF THE WEAK ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE

 

          According to the Weak Anthropic Principle the observed values of all physical and cosmological quantities must satisfy the requirements that there exist sites where carbon based intelligent life can evolve, and the present Universe is now old enough for this to have already happened.  The universe is at present finely tuned with the values of the fundamental constants that are listed in the table of BBB.  It is easy to show that small changes in some of these quantities, or in some of the dimensionless constants constructed from them, could produce dramatic changes in our present Universe.  According to the Anthropic principle small changes of this type which upset the ability of the Universe to evolve toward the production of life are not a possibility.

 

          The next three sections will discuss examples where small changes in particular physical quantities would dramatically alter the manner in which the Universe develops, and thereby provide no opportunity for the appearance of life.  Some of the material in these sections is very technical in nature, and will draw on background presented in BBB.

                  

Go to Top

5. THE FINE TUNING OF THE PROTON-PROTON CYCLE

 

          An example of this from BBB is the first interaction (20) of the proton-proton cycle for the generation of nuclear energy in the sun:

 

                   1H  +  1H   Y   2H  +  positron  +  neutrino                      (1)

                            

where 1H denotes a hydrogen nucleus, which is a proton  p.  The symbol 2H, sometimes written D or 2D, corresponds to a deuteron, a heavy hydrogen nucleus, which consists of a proton plus a neutron.  Using this notation the interaction (1) can be written:

 

                             p  +  p   Y   D   +   e+ +  <                                    (2)

 

where e+ is a positive electron called a positron, and the Greek letter nu, <, denotes a neutrino.  This reaction may be looked upon as proceeding via the formation of an intermediate transitory state in which one of the protons transforms to a neutron n plus a positron, and then the neutron combines with the other proton to form the deuteron, corresponding to the overall process:

 

                   p  +  p   =   p + n +  e+ +  <  Y   D   +   e+ +  <               (3)

 

The step  p + n  Y   D involves very little energy because the deuteron is very weakly bound.  The other possible interaction  p + p  Y   2He where two protons combine to form light helium-2 cannot occur because  2He does not have a bound state.  In other words the strong interaction is not strong enough to form 2He, and it is barely strong enough to form D.  If the strong interaction were weaker then deuterons would never form, and the sun would be unable to burn its hydrogen fuel by the proton-proton cycle.  If, on the other hand,  this interaction were stronger then the cycle would end with helium-2, and helium-4 would never form.  Nature has established a delicate balance whereby the strong interaction is just the proper strength so stars like the sun can burn their hydrogen fuel in a manner that eventually leads to the appearance of life.  

 

Go to Top

6.  STABILITY RANGE OF NUCLEI

         

          Another example of the application of the Weak Anthropic principle is the stability of atomic nuclei.  A nucleus tends to contain equal numbers of protons and neutrons because they are held together by the strong attractive forces acting between these nucleons.  As a result light nuclei have equal numbers of protons and neutrons.  When nuclei become larger the repulsive electromagnetic interactions between the positively charged protons become appreciable so more neutrons are added to reduce this repulsion.  Bismuth, with atomic number 83, has the heaviest nucleus that is not radioactive.  All larger nuclei are unstable.  We showed in BBB that the strong interaction is 137 times as strong as the electromagnetic interaction.  If the electromagnetic interaction were relatively stronger then nuclei much lighter than bismuth would become radioactive and unstable, hence unsuitable for playing roles in biological organisms.  A number of heavy atoms play important roles in the human body, such as iodine (I, atomic number 53), tin (Sn, 50), and molybdenum (Mo, 42), and they would not be available to do so if the electromagnetic interaction were much stronger.  The dimensionless fine structure constant " discussed in BBB is what determines the relative strengths of the strong and electromagnetic interactions, and this sets limits on values of " that would support human life. 

 

7.  CRITICAL DENSITY AND FLATNESS OF THE UNIVERSE

 

          A third example of the delicate balance of forces that exists in the Universe involves its large scale structure.  The Universe is found to be very close to isotropic, that is, its structure is almost the same in all directions.  It is also found to be homogeneous, that is, every large region of space looks the same.  The fact that the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic is called the Cosmological Principle. 

 

          One important parameter that characterizes the Universe is its density, meaning the average density, or the amount of mass per unit volume averaged over galaxies, galaxy clusters, and the space between them.  This density is very low, about four hydrogen atoms per cubic meter of space.  If the density of the Universe is less than a certain critical density, then the curvature of space is negative, and it will be an open system destined to expand forever.  If the density is less than the critical density the curvature of space is positive, the Universe is closed, and it will eventually contract and collapse.  Astronomers find that our actual Universe has close to the critical density, so it is an almost flat Universe with zero curvature of space.  It will also undergo continual expansion, but at a continually decelerating rate.  It will take an infinite duration in time to come to a stop at its final maximum size. 

 

 

Go to Top